Monday, September 18, 2006

The leaking of Plame's identity

The leaking of Plame's identity destroyed the undercover Brewster Jennings WMD surveillance operation – and quite likely resulted in the death of dozens of covert operatives, about whom you will never hear.

Brewster Jennings likely had proof that the Pentagon was arranging delivery of WMD into Iraq for the invading US forces to "discover."

Additionally, Brewster Jennings likely had evidence of the Administration's complicity in the events of 9/11.

Finally, Brewster Jennings could confirm that Iran was TEN YEARS away from having a functional nuke – which would totally screw-up the Israeli-led Pentagon plan to invade the entire Middle East under false pretense.

TREASON

IMPEACH

Closing down our best source of covert intelligence on WMD in the Middle East by making its covert status public - during a time of war - is akin to revealing troop movements and positions to the enemy - during a time of war.

It's TREASON on its face.

Doing so for POLITICAL reasons is IMPEACHABLE.

BUSH, CHENEY, ROVE & LIBBY all knew that Plame was a covert agent - and a key enemy if their lies were to succeed. Everyone in the WHIG knew. They all conspired to prevent the truth about WMD from being made public

When referring to Wilson, each of them at one time or another referred to him as "a Democrat."

That's POLITICAL.

That's ILLEGAL.

still not a word from these remaining supporters of Bush - the president stood in front of reporters more than once and claimed to have no idea where the leak of information to for example Judith Miller came from. In fact, the president knew, as he stood there, that he had specifically and authorized the exact leak in question, for the purposes of a vendetta with Joe Wilson.

the president hugely abused his authority and powers, wrongfully, and he stood in front of cameras and reporters and lied about it, willfully, repeatedly. he engaged in a willful conspiracy to go after Joe Wilson for debunking the lie about uranium, and he happily burned down a CIA operative and her operations with a LEAK of information. if there was a declassification, it was certainly not recorded or documented or communicated, and, in all likelihood, was made up after the fact once the Fitzgerald investigation got going.

This same president has deployed the NSA and who knows which other components of the national intelligence apparatus against the American people in direct violation of federal law.

he has abused and abused his trust and the power of his office, and it is time for him to leave that office.

.. "I don't know of anyone in my administration who has leaked," Mr. Bush told reporters in Chicago. But, he added, "If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know it, and we'll take the appropriate action. And this investigation is a good thing."

The president added, "There's too much leaking in Washington. That's just the way it is. We've had leaks from the executive branch and leaks from the legislative branch. I want to know who the leakers are." ...

George Bush, lying about his own leak: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/01/national/main575986.shtml

Donald Rumsfeld on Leakers of Secret Information:

... No, I'll tell you about leaks. When a person takes classified information and gives it to someone who is not cleared for classified information, whether the person's from the Pentagon or any department of government, they're violating federal criminal law. And they ought to go to jail. That's not complicated.

Kalb: What are the laws they are violating? Just --

Rumsfeld: The laws relating to classified information are quite strict as to who may be given access to that information. And so to the extent that people violate the rules with respect to classified information, they are breaking federal criminal law.

Now, they are also potentially putting people's lives at risk, and that's a very -- it's a terrible thing to do ...

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2002/t04102002_t0410sd.html

Scott McClellan, lying about Bush's leak:

"If someone in this administration leaked classified information, they will no longer be a part of this administration, because that's not the way this White House operates."

It's the modern Republican way. Commit a crime today; legalize the act tomorrow.

Here is what Scott McClellan had to say on July 18, 2003:

Q: When was it [the NIE Report] actually declassified?

MR. McCLELLAN: It was officially declassified today.

According to Fitzgerald's court paper - Libby disclosed information from the NIE to Judith Miller on July 8, 2003 - ten days earlier.

So, what was the official status of the report for those 10 days? If it was declassified prior to or on July 8, why was it only shared with Judy Miller, and not released "officially" until July 18?

No comments: